What Is the CISA KEV Catalog? Understanding Known Exploited Vulnerabilities

Written By:
Founder & CTO
June 23, 2025

The cybersecurity threat landscape has drastically evolved over the past decade. With an ever-growing reliance on software systems, applications, cloud infrastructure, and microservices, vulnerabilities within these platforms have become prime targets for malicious exploitation. As developers, engineers, and DevSecOps professionals, understanding where to focus security efforts is paramount, not just for compliance but to build truly resilient and hardened systems. This is where the CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) Catalog plays a pivotal role. The CISA KEV catalog is not just a list, it’s an operational tool for making informed, risk-based decisions in security engineering.

In this blog, we’ll break down everything developers need to know about the CISA KEV catalog, explore its structure, benefits, use cases, and how to effectively integrate it into your vulnerability management and software development life cycle (SDLC). This post is crafted specifically for a developer audience and follows a format optimized for Webflow import, using approximate h5 and h6 styles.

What Is the CISA KEV Catalog?

The CISA KEV catalog, short for “Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog,” is a curated list maintained by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). It includes software and hardware vulnerabilities that have been confirmed to be actively exploited in the wild. These are not speculative risks or theoretical security gaps; they are vulnerabilities attackers are already leveraging to breach systems, deploy ransomware, steal data, or conduct espionage.

Unlike databases like the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) or CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) metrics, which list all known vulnerabilities including those with no known exploits, the CISA KEV focuses exclusively on threats that are being actively used against real targets.

This makes the CISA KEV catalog a uniquely high-signal source of truth for any developer, DevOps, or security engineer managing modern applications, APIs, distributed systems, or cloud-native infrastructure.

Why CISA KEV Matters for Developers
Prioritizing Real Threats Over Hypotheticals

In a typical software environment, hundreds of vulnerabilities may show up in static scans, dependency analysis tools, or infrastructure monitoring solutions. However, not all of them are relevant to every organization or are being actively exploited. The key advantage of CISA KEV for developers is prioritization. Rather than chasing every low-severity or non-exploited CVE, developers can now focus on patching what's proven to be weaponized.

This drastically reduces alert fatigue, brings focus to security sprints, and aligns team efforts with real-world threat activity.

Enabling Intelligence-Driven Vulnerability Remediation

CISA KEV is built on verified intelligence, each CVE listed is accompanied by a known history of exploitation in active threat campaigns. This intelligence isn’t speculative. It’s based on real incidents sourced from cyber threat feeds, public disclosures, intelligence communities, and vendor security reports. For developers and DevOps engineers, this means your patching decisions are grounded in field data, not just risk ratings.

By using CISA KEV, development teams shift from reactive to proactive defense. You’re not waiting to be breached to understand what matters, you already know which vulnerabilities are hot targets for attackers.

How a Vulnerability Gets Added to the CISA KEV Catalog
CVE Verification and Exploitation Evidence

To make it into the CISA KEV Catalog, a vulnerability must first be assigned a CVE ID (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), the universal identifier maintained by MITRE. But that’s just the beginning.

Next, the vulnerability must have concrete, verifiable evidence of active exploitation. This could include:

  • Data breaches associated with the vulnerability

  • Exploit toolkits containing working code

  • Widespread scanning or abuse in the wild

  • Incident reports linking real-world attacks to the CVE

This is what separates KEV from traditional vulnerability databases. It filters out theoretical risks and gives developers a high-confidence, high-priority subset to target.

Remediation Requirements

CISA only adds vulnerabilities to the KEV catalog if a patch or mitigation is available. This ensures developers and organizations aren’t left in the dark. Once a KEV vulnerability is published, there is always actionable guidance, be it a software update, configuration hardening, or a vendor-issued workaround.

Benefits of CISA KEV for DevSecOps and Engineering Teams
Sharper Focus for Security Backlogs

In most agile or product-focused development environments, time and resources for patching are limited. Backlogs of “technical debt” related to security often spiral into the hundreds or thousands of findings. The CISA KEV catalog helps reduce noise by offering a dynamic shortlist of vulnerabilities that must be addressed immediately.

Rather than debating the urgency of a CVSS 9.8 issue with no known exploit, developers can take decisive action on a CVSS 7.2 issue that’s actively exploited by ransomware gangs.

Reducing Time to Remediation

Federal agencies are required to remediate KEV vulnerabilities within a strict 15 to 60-day timeframe, depending on the specific threat. Private sector teams can mirror this policy internally, driving faster MTTR (Mean Time to Remediation) and reducing the window of exploitability.

This culture of urgency translates to fewer breaches, better compliance, and more secure products.

Improving CI/CD and Supply Chain Security

Developers today rely heavily on open-source packages, container images, third-party APIs, and microservices. Any of these components can be a risk vector. By embedding CISA KEV checks into the CI/CD pipeline or integrating with tools like Dependabot, Snyk, or Trivy, teams can automatically flag and block builds that contain exploited vulnerabilities.

This is security at the speed of dev, not bolted on after release.

Using the CISA KEV Catalog in Your Workflow
Automate Ingestion and Integration

CISA provides KEV updates in machine-readable formats (CSV and JSON). Developers can use these to:

  • Ingest KEV data daily using cron or GitHub Actions

  • Sync it with internal security dashboards

  • Connect it to ticketing systems like Jira or ServiceNow

CI/CD Pipeline Integration

A modern CI pipeline can fetch KEV data during builds. For instance:

  • A Jenkins or GitHub Actions job can cross-reference the build’s dependencies with the KEV CVE list

  • If a match is found, it can either fail the build or tag it for immediate review

This ensures no known exploited vulnerabilities slip into production undetected.

Infrastructure-as-Code and Runtime Monitoring

In environments built with Terraform, Ansible, or Kubernetes, KEV can be used to scan AMIs, Docker base images, or cloud-native packages. Alerts can be tied to:

  • Use of known-vulnerable versions

  • Base image layers with KEV CVEs

  • Misconfigurations exposing KEV-listed services

Runtime monitoring solutions like Falco or Osquery can alert on attempted exploitation of KEV vulnerabilities, making detection actionable.

Real-World Developer Use Cases
Case 1: Remediating Log4Shell in Microservices

The CVE-2021-44228 Log4Shell vulnerability entered KEV almost immediately after its discovery. A microservices team that had KEV integrated into its build pipelines was able to:

  • Instantly flag all services using vulnerable versions of Log4j

  • Push patches within 12 hours

  • Avoid downstream compromises from lateral movement

Case 2: Securing Legacy Code

A fintech company running legacy Java applications noticed a KEV update including CVE-2017-9805 (Struts2). With KEV alerts integrated into their weekly patch scan, they:

  • Located the vulnerable Struts module

  • Applied vendor-recommended isolation and access restrictions

  • Escaped being targeted by the exploit during a botnet surge

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
Mistaking CVSS for Exploitability

CVSS measures potential impact, not current threat. Many teams mistakenly prioritize CVSS 10 vulnerabilities that are not actively exploited, while missing out on medium-score vulnerabilities that are being weaponized today.

KEV acts as a real-world filter. It helps developers understand where to act first, avoiding wasted resources.

Not Automating Updates

KEV is dynamic. New CVEs are added weekly. If you're not syncing the latest data automatically, you're missing out on critical updates. It’s best practice to set a daily or hourly pull mechanism, depending on your deployment frequency.

Ignoring Non-Patched KEV Items

Sometimes, KEV lists CVEs before a patch is available. In these cases, virtual patching (e.g., using WAFs, network segmentation, or container rebase) and strict monitoring are essential interim strategies.

How CISA KEV Complements Other Security Tools

While KEV is powerful on its own, it is most effective when paired with:

  • CVSS for severity scoring

  • EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) for forecasting likely threats

  • SBOMs (Software Bill of Materials) to trace impacted components

  • SAST/DAST/IAST tools to identify application layer weaknesses

KEV gives your vulnerability posture ground truth, a clear “what’s being attacked now” lens to focus your energy and engineering time.

Final Thoughts

The CISA KEV catalog is more than a compliance list. For developers, it's a tactical guide to secure your software against real-world threats. In a world where zero-days and exploit kits are sold on dark markets, staying ahead means knowing what’s being exploited, not just what could be.

By integrating KEV into your SDLC, CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure builds, and security monitoring, your team can:

  • Cut patch deployment cycles from weeks to days

  • Focus developer time on critical issues

  • Deliver more secure software, faster

This is modern security engineering. And the KEV catalog is a cornerstone of that approach.