What Is Post-Quantum Cryptography and Why It Matters Now

Written By:
Founder & CTO
June 21, 2025

The digital era is defined by data. Whether it’s sensitive personal information, financial transactions, confidential communications, or national security assets, data flows through encrypted channels every second. But much of this digital security relies on assumptions that could soon be overturned by one of the most transformative technologies of our time: quantum computing.

Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) is the collective term for cryptographic algorithms that are secure not only against current classical computers but also against future quantum computers. These quantum-resistant algorithms are not just a technical curiosity; they are the next frontier in cyber defense. As quantum computers inch closer to practical viability, developers, architects, and security engineers must begin transitioning systems toward quantum-safe encryption. The time to act is now.

The Quantum Threat Is Real and Imminent
Quantum Computing Is Progressing Faster Than You Think

Quantum computing is no longer just the domain of theoretical physics. Giants like IBM, Google, Microsoft, and Intel are all actively developing quantum processors. Startups like Rigetti, IonQ, and Xanadu are achieving new milestones in qubit fidelity, error correction, and coherence time.

What makes quantum computing such a threat to current encryption methods is its ability to solve problems in polynomial or sub-exponential time that would take classical computers millennia. Shor’s algorithm, in particular, can factor large integers and compute discrete logarithms exponentially faster, breaking RSA, ECC, and Diffie-Hellman encryption in the process.

The Y2Q Scenario: Harvest Now, Decrypt Later

Y2Q, or "Years to Quantum", refers to the point in time when a quantum computer will become powerful enough to break today’s public key encryption schemes. Though estimates vary, many experts believe this point could arrive within 10 to 20 years. The more pressing issue is that adversaries can start harvesting encrypted data today, storing it with the expectation of decrypting it once quantum capabilities are realized. This is the harvest-now-decrypt-later threat model, and it renders all current encryption insecure in the long term.

From banking and healthcare to military and law enforcement systems, data encrypted today under RSA or ECC could be cracked in the future unless we transition to quantum-safe algorithms.

What Is Post-Quantum Cryptography?
Definition and Core Concepts

Post-Quantum Cryptography refers to cryptographic techniques that are believed to be secure against both classical and quantum computers. PQC does not rely on traditional number-theoretic problems like factoring or discrete logarithms. Instead, it leverages alternative hard problems such as:

  • Lattice-based problems (e.g., Learning With Errors – LWE)

  • Multivariate polynomial equations

  • Hash-based constructions

  • Code-based problems

  • Isogeny-based problems

These post-quantum cryptographic algorithms have different performance and security trade-offs, but they share one critical feature: no known quantum algorithm can solve them efficiently.

Why Developers Must Care

Post-quantum cryptography is not a niche concern limited to cryptographers. It affects every developer building applications that:

  • Use HTTPS or TLS for secure communication

  • Sign or verify digital signatures

  • Encrypt data at rest or in transit

  • Use public key infrastructure (PKI) for authentication

  • Implement identity, access management, or secure messaging

The adoption of post-quantum cryptographic primitives will require protocol updates, new libraries, key storage changes, testing, and validation. This isn't just a backend security feature, it's a systems-level transformation that developers must actively engage with.

Core Post-Quantum Algorithms You Should Know
Lattice-Based Cryptography: Kyber and Dilithium

Lattice-based cryptography is currently the leading approach in post-quantum research due to its excellent balance between efficiency, security, and flexibility.

ML-KEM (Kyber):

  • Kyber is a Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM), standardized by NIST as FIPS 203.

  • It is based on Module-LWE (Learning With Errors) problems.

  • Offers strong quantum-safe encryption with compact key sizes and fast performance.

  • Easily integrates into TLS, SSH, and other public key exchange protocols.

ML-DSA (Dilithium):

  • Dilithium is a digital signature scheme also selected by NIST, standardized as FIPS 204.

  • Designed for high efficiency and tight security under the LWE and SIS problems.

  • Signatures are smaller and faster to verify compared to many classical methods.

  • Ideal for firmware signing, secure software distribution, and digital identity protocols.

Why It Matters: These algorithms can be used in today’s systems with minimal changes and are expected to replace RSA and ECC across most secure communication layers in the next decade.

Hash-Based Signatures: SLH-DSA (SPHINCS+)

Hash-based cryptography predates even RSA, and modern implementations like SLH-DSA, built on SPHINCS+, offer robust security foundations.

  • It’s stateless, hash-based, and provably secure under strong assumptions.

  • SLH-DSA is part of the FIPS 205 standard and is a fallback option in case of vulnerabilities found in lattice-based schemes.

  • Slightly slower than lattice-based signatures and produces larger signatures, but offers excellent long-term security assurances.

Why It Matters: Perfect for high-assurance systems where post-quantum digital signatures must be resilient and auditable.

Code-Based Cryptography: HQC

HQC (Hamming Quasi-Cyclic) is another NIST-approved algorithm that leverages error-correcting codes.

  • Based on the hardness of decoding random linear codes.

  • Offers algorithmic diversity, which is important in maintaining a layered defense.

  • Larger keys than Kyber but simpler structures and different assumptions.

Why It Matters: HQC can be used as a secondary layer or failover algorithm, especially where diversity is key for cryptographic resilience.

Why Post-Quantum Cryptography Is a Developer Priority
Future-Proofing Sensitive Applications

Your application’s users might not care about what kind of cryptography you use, but they absolutely care that their data remains secure, especially over time. If your software handles:

  • Medical data with multi-decade retention

  • Legal or governmental documents

  • Academic research or intellectual property

  • Encrypted backups and logs

Then you must start preparing your systems to survive the quantum transition. Post-quantum cryptography is not just a future consideration, it’s a form of cryptographic sustainability.

Easy Integration into Existing Protocols

Thanks to hybrid models and extensions like TLS 1.3 hybrid KEM and post-quantum SSH, developers don’t need to abandon existing frameworks. Libraries like OpenSSL 3.2+, liboqs, BoringSSL, and Google Tink now support Kyber and Dilithium.

Performance Parity with Classical Algorithms

Modern post-quantum algorithms are surprisingly efficient. In some benchmarks, Kyber performs faster than RSA or ECC, particularly in key generation and handshake times. This efficiency is critical for developers working with:

  • Mobile applications

  • Embedded systems

  • Microservices with short-lived keys

  • Secure APIs with high traffic loads

Developer Strategy for Adopting Post-Quantum Cryptography
1. Audit Your Cryptographic Inventory

Make a comprehensive list of where cryptography is used in your applications:

  • Are you using TLS with RSA or ECC for secure communication?

  • Do you rely on JWT tokens signed with classical algorithms?

  • Are firmware or binaries signed with RSA-2048?

  • Is SSH authentication using ECC keys?

Start documenting these points of encryption and signing to plan a phased migration.

2. Implement Hybrid Encryption Models

Use Kyber + X25519 in TLS handshakes. This gives you quantum-safe forward secrecy while retaining compatibility with non-upgraded clients. Most browsers and servers now support TLS 1.3 hybrid modes.

3. Begin Signing With Post-Quantum Algorithms

Start issuing Dilithium signatures alongside your classical signatures for:

  • Software packages

  • Container images

  • Firmware updates

  • API tokens

Verify them both in your CI/CD pipelines and allow fallback to legacy if needed.

4. Monitor Library and OS Support

Stay current on developments from:

  • OpenSSL

  • BoringSSL

  • liboqs

  • RustCrypto

  • PQClean

Also check on NIST, ETSI, and IETF guidelines for implementation best practices.

5. Educate Your Team

Bring developers, DevSecOps, and architects up to speed. Hold regular internal reviews and discussions on post-quantum adoption paths. Include PQC checks in code reviews and architecture design decisions.

Real-World Applications of Post-Quantum Cryptography
Apple and Signal
  • Apple’s iMessage uses PQ3, a hybrid encryption protocol combining classical and post-quantum cryptography.

  • Signal has implemented PQXDH, bringing quantum-safe encryption to millions of secure chats.

Cloudflare and Google
  • Cloudflare uses Kyber and Dilithium in their Zero Trust access solutions.

  • Google has run post-quantum TLS experiments in Chrome and Gmail, helping define hybrid standards.

AWS and Microsoft
  • AWS KMS and Azure Key Vault are adding support for post-quantum key storage.

  • Developers can already test APIs that handle post-quantum certificate chains.

What’s Coming Next

The field of post-quantum cryptography is evolving. New signature schemes like FALCON, more efficient code-based encryption, and hardware-optimized PQC accelerators are on the horizon. The next few years will see:

  • New drafts of FIPS 206

  • Hardware vendors baking PQC into TPMs and Secure Enclaves

  • Standardization of quantum-safe identity frameworks

The Developer’s Role in Quantum-Safe Security

The transition to post-quantum cryptography won’t be easy. But developers are the linchpins of this change. Every secure app, protocol, API, and authentication mechanism built today must be designed with a quantum-safe future in mind. As a developer, your choices in 2025 will define the digital resilience of 2035.