Benchmarking AI Coding Models on Large Codebases: Scalability, Speed, and Errors

The explosive adoption of Large Language Models in software development has transformed how developers write, debug, and reason about code. However, as projects scale and evolve, the tools we use must also handle increasing complexity, cross-file reasoning, and long-term architectural continuity. This raises a critical architectural question: Should developers rely on stateless LLMs or embrace memory-augmented models for long-term code understanding?

This blog provides a deep technical comparison of these two paradigms. We will analyze their underlying architectures, explore their strengths and limitations, and benchmark them across real-world software development scenarios, especially within the context of large-scale, multi-repository codebases. By the end, you will gain a clear understanding of where each model shines, what tradeoffs they carry, and which is more aligned with modern developer workflows that demand long-term context retention.

‍

What are Stateless LLMs

Stateless Large Language Models, such as the base versions of GPT, Claude, or LLaMA, operate with no memory of prior interactions or tasks. Each input is processed independently, and the model does not retain any state beyond the current prompt-response cycle.

Core Properties of Stateless LLMs

• Fixed Context Window: The model operates within a limited number of tokens, typically ranging from 4K to 128K or more in the case of extended context models. All relevant information must be supplied within that window. This constraint has major implications for code understanding, particularly in large codebases that exceed hundreds of thousands of tokens.
• No Session Persistence: There is no mechanism for carrying over context, decisions, or user intent between prompts unless explicitly passed again. This makes stateless LLMs unsuitable for cumulative workflows such as long-term refactoring, multi-file debugging, or ongoing architectural planning.
• High Throughput, Low Latency: Stateless LLMs can be optimized for faster inference, as they do not require memory lookup or retrieval operations. For short, atomic coding tasks, this can be advantageous.
• Deterministic Prompt Behavior: Given the same input, the model consistently produces similar outputs. While this ensures predictability, it limits flexibility and adaptability across extended tasks.

Typical Developer Workflows Using Stateless LLMs

• Generating isolated code snippets based on narrow prompts
• Writing unit tests for single functions or methods
• Rewriting individual functions for clarity or performance
• Getting quick help with syntax or unfamiliar libraries

Stateless LLMs are well-suited for atomic developer tasks but are inherently limited when the scope expands beyond what can fit within their immediate context window.

‍

What are Memory-Augmented Models

Memory-augmented models extend the capabilities of LLMs by integrating a persistent memory layer. This memory can store previous interactions, code snippets, metadata, user preferences, or any form of external knowledge required to maintain long-term context. These models can then retrieve relevant pieces of memory during subsequent interactions, enabling continuity and coherence over time.

Core Components of Memory-Augmented Architectures

• Vector Store or Key-Value Memory: At the heart of most memory-augmented systems is a structured memory backend. This typically takes the form of an embedding-based vector store, such as Pinecone or Weaviate, which holds semantically indexed representations of code and prior interactions. Some implementations use learnable memory matrices or database-backed key-value stores.
• Semantic Retrieval Mechanism: Instead of relying purely on token matching, memory-augmented models use dense retrieval strategies to locate semantically relevant past information. For example, if a developer previously discussed an API authentication pattern, the model can retrieve this memory when assisting with related tasks in the future.
• Context Injection and Rewriting: Retrieved memories are then merged or adapted into the prompt. This requires intelligent context construction to prevent token overflow and to ensure relevance. Advanced systems use summarization, re-ranking, or memory prioritization strategies to optimize which memories are injected.
• Session-Aware Interaction Loop: Unlike stateless models, memory-augmented models support a continuous feedback loop. Developers can issue multi-turn instructions, ask follow-up questions, or build software incrementally with the agent retaining the evolving context.

Developer-Oriented Use Cases for Memory-Augmented Models

• Multi-file code analysis and understanding
• Refactoring large codebases over multiple sessions
• Long-term planning and implementation of architectural changes
• Agent-driven workflows with checkpointed memory
• Onboarding developers with prior history and team coding conventions

With memory augmentation, models begin to mimic how a senior developer builds long-term mental models of a codebase, continuously refining their understanding as new information emerges.

‍

Core Comparison: Stateless LLMs vs Memory-Augmented Models

Code Understanding Scope

Stateless LLMs are fundamentally constrained by the token limit of their context window. Even with extensions to 100K or 200K tokens, most modern codebases with cross-repo dependencies, deeply nested modules, and extensive documentation simply do not fit. Memory-augmented models overcome this by decoupling knowledge persistence from the context window, allowing for targeted retrieval and reasoning across arbitrarily large code contexts.

Reasoning Depth

Without memory, stateless models treat each interaction in isolation, lacking any sense of temporal or logical continuity. This leads to brittle reasoning, inconsistent refactorings, and frequent repetition of instructions. Memory-augmented models, by contrast, accumulate logical scaffolding over time, allowing them to perform deeper, multi-step reasoning, such as understanding why a previous implementation decision was made or how a certain module evolved.

Workflow Integration

In developer environments like VS Code or IntelliJ, workflows are not atomic. Developers switch between files, modify partially completed code, return days later to continue tasks, or delegate work to teammates. Memory-augmented agents can align with this natural workflow by anchoring interactions to persistent states, enabling context-aware suggestions regardless of when or how the task was initiated.

Speed vs Intelligence Tradeoff

Stateless models are leaner and faster, making them ideal for low-latency completions. Memory-augmented models introduce overhead from retrieval, summarization, and ranking, but this cost is offset by gains in contextual richness and coherence. For mission-critical tasks involving large code understanding, accuracy and alignment are often more valuable than millisecond latency.

‍

Architectural Patterns in Memory-Augmented Agents

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Code

One of the most common patterns is RAG, where the model first searches a memory store for relevant context and then generates responses based on both the query and retrieved documents. In the coding domain, this means looking up related functions, previous bug fixes, test results, or architectural patterns.

Long-Term Memory Loops in Agent Frameworks

Modern agentic systems use memory not just as a passive store, but as an evolving knowledge base. For example, in frameworks like LangGraph or in platforms such as GoCodeo, agents actively update memory after completing subtasks, creating a form of longitudinal state tracking. These systems enable agents to plan multi-step software development tasks, adjust based on failures, and return to earlier checkpoints intelligently.

Hybrid Context Handling

Memory-augmented agents often employ hybrid context strategies, where local context is handled via standard prompt engineering, while global context is handled via memory retrieval. This separation allows the system to reason about immediate code changes while maintaining a longer-term understanding of project goals or team conventions.

‍

Ideal Applications and Limitations

When to Prefer Stateless LLMs

• Short code completions within a single file
• Low-latency use cases with minimal memory overhead
• Experiments and prototyping with rapid feedback
• One-off scripting or automation tasks

When to Prefer Memory-Augmented Models

• Large codebase understanding across sessions
• Full-stack application planning and implementation
• Continuous integration workflows with context preservation
• Developer onboarding with historical project memory
• Code review agents that learn team preferences over time

Current Challenges in Memory-Augmented Models

• Latency Bottlenecks: Retrieval and memory fusion increase computational overhead. This is especially significant in real-time IDE plugins.
• Memory Drift: Poor retrieval quality or overly aggressive memory inclusion can lead to hallucinations or incorrect context merging.
• Security and Privacy: Persistent memory must be scoped and managed carefully to avoid accidental leakage of sensitive project data.
• Tooling Complexity: Implementing memory at scale requires orchestration between memory stores, chunking strategies, embedding models, and ranking logic. This increases system complexity, especially in multi-agent systems.

‍

The Future of AI Coding Tools Lies in Persistent Context

As developers increasingly collaborate with intelligent agents in the IDE, the next frontier is continuity. LLMs must evolve beyond isolated brilliance into stateful collaborators that remember, adapt, and reason over time.

Memory-augmented models represent a fundamental shift, enabling agents that understand the developer’s intent not just in the current prompt, but across days, projects, and iterations.

In production-grade AI coding platforms like GoCodeo, memory is not just a feature, it is the foundation. It enables multi-agent orchestration, intelligent backtracking, and end-to-end development workflows where the agent evolves with the project.

‍

Which One is Better for Long-Term Code Understanding

If your goal is short-term productivity within a single file or a constrained context window, stateless LLMs offer a fast, reliable solution. However, if your work involves navigating large codebases, managing long-running projects, or collaborating with intelligent agents over time, memory-augmented models are vastly superior.

They are capable of tracking architectural patterns, understanding long-term dependencies, and enabling AI agents that function more like real collaborators than stateless autocomplete engines.

The real advantage is not in raw token capacity, but in contextual intelligence over time, and that is where memory-augmented systems lead the way.